Jason Mikula Inbound Marketing Blog: SEO, PPC, Social Media & More

18Jul/121

Think You Can Trust Your Campaign’s Geo-Targeting? Think Again.

The ability to geo-target our web-based ads is something we take for granted.  It enables us to segment visitors and promotions, target specific products and ad copy to specific regions, and ensure we’re only showing ads in geographic areas we serve.

It’s precisely BECAUSE we take geo-targeting for granted that we fail to question if it’s working correctly.

Geotargeting in AdWords

Example Geotargeting in AdWords

 

How Does Geo-Targeting in Search PPC Ads Work?

Google AdWords Targeting Options

Google AdWords Targeting Options

MS adCenter Targeting Options

MS adCenter Targeting Options

There are two ways Google (adCenter works very similarly) matches your targeting to a users’ query – via their physical location and their search intent during a search session.   Physical location relies on IP address to determine a user’s location.  “Searching for, or viewing pages about” means that if a searcher includes a geographic term in their query (eg, “flower shops in New York City”), even if they’re in Illinois, they can see ads targeted to New York City.

New York Flowers SERP

New York Ad Results When Searching from Chicago

How Accurate is IP-based Targeting?

I recently launched a set of campaigns in both Google AdWords and Bing/Yahoo adCenter targeting Ohio and Virginia.  The campaign I am working on has specific product and legal requirements that vary according to state law.

In trying to explain discrepancies in performance between them, I examined how many clicks from my AdWords and adCenter campaigns were coming from outside of their targeted states.  Traffic for each campaign is going to a dedicated landing page that is noindexed (can’t show in organic results) – the only way to arrive at this campaign is via the search campaigns.

Geolocation IP Testing - Methodology

I created two custom segments in Google Analytics, one for each landing page, and then added a secondary dimension for Region.  Any visits where Region was (not set) was counted as out of target area.

Google Analytics Results

Google Analytics Results

Results

I was surprised at what I found.  Performance in AdWords was generally good, with 4% of clicks in Ohio coming from out of state and 13% of clicks in Virginia coming from out of state.

Performance in adCenter, however, was not as good.  Nearly 21% of clicks in Virginia came from out of state, and a whopping 29% of clicks in Ohio came from out of state.

In target area visits vs. Out of target area visits (raw number)

Percent Out of Target, AdWords vs. adCenter

Percent Out of Target, AdWords vs. adCenter

In Target area vs. Out of target area (raw number)

In Target area vs. Out of target area (raw number)

Percent Out of target, (AdWords vs. adCenter

Not only was the percent of clicks coming from outside of the targeted area high; some were wildly far off.  I recorded clicks coming from Texas, California, Illinois, Alabama, New Mexico, and Maine for both AdWords and adCenter.

I touched based with several industry colleagues whom I know advertise with adCenter, and all reported a significant proportion of clicks coming from outside areas they were targeting.

When I raised this issue with my account rep at Yahoo, he ran and sent a geolocation report (based on adCenter/Yahoo’s own systems and data no doubt) showing that all of their clicks originated within Ohio and Virginia.

How to Fix Broken Geo-targeting?

There isn’t an easy fix for this – even if you select the strictest targeting option (based on physical location and ignoring any searcher intent), you cannot be 100% sure your ad will only show in your desired target area.  It would seem that adCenter has room to improve their IP-based targeting, given the high percentage of clicks coming from outside of the targeted area.

As more users move to using mobile phones as their primary device, this should become less of a problem, as geolocation accuracy is significantly better on mobile devices vs. desktop computers due to their location detection hardware.

Filed under: Uncategorized 1 Comment
16Jul/120

Faking Your Way into Google Local in 8 Easy Steps

Getting to the top of Google’s organic listings is hard work. So why not manipulate the less scrutinized local listings to fake your way to the top? Here (tongue in cheek) are 8 quick steps to getting to the top of local listings.

Step One - Keyword Rich Domain

Get a keyword rich domain name, preferably also including the geographic area you’re targeting.  For example, www.cashadvancemilwaukee.com.  Make sure to register through Domains by Proxy to obscure your identity. Cash Advance Milwaukee registered through Domains by Proxy

Step Two - $$$$

Monetize traffic through affiliate call transfer program and by acting as an affiliate for a lead generator. Cash Advance Milwaukee Homepage

Step Three - You Need a Fake Address

Get a bogus address with an executive office service or mail drop company like FedEx office, UPS office, etc.  This is where Cash Advance Milwaukee is purportedly located. 

Streetview of Cash Advance Milwaukee

Step Four - Get Some Bogus Reviews

Hire some offshore workers to generate fake reviews of your location on services that feed into Google Local/Google+.

Step Five - Now for Some Junky Exact Match Anchor Text Links...

Generate some spam profile and comment links with highly targeted keywords

Opensiteexplorer Report on Cash Advance Milwaukee

Step 6 - BAM! There ya go.

Rank for highly competitive terms.

SERP Milwaukee Payday Loans

Step 7 - Watch the money roll in

Money!

Step 8 - Rinse & repeat for different cities
Houston Easy Online Payday Loans

Ohio Payday Loans Local

Filed under: Uncategorized No Comments
9Jul/120

What Does it Mean to be an SEO “Community”?

I recently had the opportunity to attend Seer’s second “Search Church” event, Did You Google It?, where an impressive panel of digital marketers (Tom Critchlow of Distilled, Mike King of iAcquire, Ethan Lyon of Seer, and Wil Reynolds of Seer) walked through how they would revamp one non-profit’s online presence and marketing strategy.

While the presentation focused on one specific non-profit, The William Way Community Center of Philadelphia, the lessons were applicable to the many non-profits and small businesses in attendance.

I also recently had the chance to attend the In-house SEO Exchange in Seattle following the popular SMX Advanced Conference.  I spent time discussing real issues in-house SEO face at companies like Microsoft, REI, Eddie Bauer, Amazon, Trip Advisor, Home Depot, Cost Co, Nordstrom, UrbanSpoon, and more.

Can Haz Community?

Both of these events got me thinking about the idea of search engine optimization or, more broadly, inbound marketers as a community.  While it may seem counter-intuitive in a field as competitive as SEO or PPC, as a profession, we’re constantly in unchartered waters.  Whether it’s the latest algorithm update from Google, government privacy regulation, or the latest tool, we don’t learn this stuff from a college course, we learn it from each other.  While there MANY conferences that exist in this space (SES, SMX, PubCon, Link Love, Search Love, etc.), these exist mainly to transmit knowledge from the people driving the industry forward to more mainstream participants from enterprise companies to small and medium-sized businesses.

What does it mean to be part of an “SEO community”?

While there are certainly some cities that can claim to be hubs of the SEO community, SEO practitioners are distributed across the country, working for agencies, in-house at corporations, and consulting.  Many blogs and message boards serve as forums for discussion – SEOMoz, SEOBook, Webmaster World, Inbound.org, not to mention countless groups on LinkedIn, Twitter hashtags, etc.  However, in these public settings, most are unwilling to part with too much private data or too many strategic insights.  Those working in-house (vs agency) are especially limited, as it’s immediately obvious what site or company they’re discussing, and they’re often operating in a much more isolated environment than their agency counterparts.

Going Beyond SEO Competiton

While there are certainly some cities that can claim to be hubs of the SEO community, SEO practitioners are distributed across the country (and world), working for agencies, in-house at corporations, and consulting.  Many blogs and message boards serve as forums for discussion – SEOMoz, SEOBook, Webmaster World, Inbound.org, not to mention countless groups on LinkedIn, Twitter hashtags, etc.  However, in these public settings, most are unwilling to part with too much private data nor too many strategic insights.  Those working in-house (vs agency) are especially limited, as it’s immediately obvious what site or company they’re discussing, and they’re often operating in a much more isolated environment than their agency counterparts.

A Social Contract for SEOs

What does it mean to be part of an SEO community?  Is there a “social contract” of sort?  I would argue that there is.  If you want to be part of the community and reap the benefits of participating, you have to be willing to contribute something in turn.  This goes beyond reading and commenting on blogs to actively participate in things like Twitter chats, attending industry events and conferences, sharing original data and insights, and so on – above all contributing your insights.  Add value, and you’ll be recognized and reap the rewards of your investment.

Stop Wearing Hats

Frequently the discussion in the SEO world is boiled down to so-called “white hat” vs “black hat”.  I think anyone who has spent significant time working in the industry knows it’s significantly more complicated than this.  Sometimes I think it’s easy to stand in Rand Fishkin’s shoes (selling software and speaking at conferences – not driving bottom line business results in hyper-competitive industries) and advocate a “ethical”, “white hat” SEO strategy.

Even major agencies in the SEO space can advocate this, as their suggestions are often divorced from the actual implementation and bottom line results – they’re often brought on as consultants to provide suggestions, not execute strategies and measure results.

“Black” vs “white” is a false dichotomy that divides the community and limits discussion and ability to learn.  To be clear – I’m not advocating illegal techniques (eg, hacking websites, automated comment spam, xRumer, etc.).  SEO techniques are about a trade-off between expediency and longevity – legitimate sites that hope to continue to grow tend to favor a more conservative approach to SEO, which is only logical.

Is "Outing" Others Bad?

This brings me to my next point – one of major contention in the SEO community – of “outing” others.  While I am sympathetic to both sides of the argument here, I’m generally not opposed to openly discussing the tactics other sites are using.  If you’re techniques are “publicly” visible in the sense that they’re discoverable through tools like SEOMoz, Ahrefs, Majestic, Screaming Frog, etc., then they’re fair game to discuss.

One of the more high profile cases recently was that of iAcquire (disclosure: companies I have been affiliated with have been clients of iAcquire).  A site owner “outed” them for buying links.  First of all, anyone knowledgeable in the SEO industry was likely already aware of iAcquire’s business model.  Secondly, this fostered an open discussion (more, more) both about the effectiveness and about the ethic of compensating for links.  iAcquire itself is still penalized by Google as a result of this “outing” – their site is completely deindexed.  The result has been that iAcquire no longer is engaging in compensating linking, and likely others in the industry who were are now pivoting away from doing so.

iAcquire

Community Facilitates the Evolving Practice of SEO

This is how SEO evolves as a practice -- through transparency, openness and discussion. If it didn’t, we’d all still be talking about keyword density and meta keyword tags.  In order for SEO to evolve and respond to Google’s ever-changing algorithm, we have to be open to discussing techniques, their effectiveness, their riskiness and so on -- including “black” or “grey” hat techniques Google may frown upon as well as evolving best practices.

Filed under: Uncategorized No Comments
22Jun/121

PR Doesn’t Stand for “Press Release”

(note: I thought I was really clever coming up with this title, but evidently Brian Solis used it in this post in 2009 to illustrate a similar issue)

Danny Sullivan's epic rant at SMX Advanced hit home with me, because "link building" is something my company has been struggling with as an organization. The entire practice is geared around building links for "SEO value" - which is completely disconnected from the original function of a link. Instead of providing additional information to users or acting as a reference, many links placed for "link building" have only a vague connection to the content in which they're embedded.

Companies that do "real" marketing and PR, companies that have a defined brand, don't have to worry (as much) about link building as, say, a site like OnlineAutoInsurance.org. These brands don't have to worry about generating links that "look" natural -- their links ARE natural.

With that in mind, I have seven tips for using PR strategies for "link building":

1) PR does not mean “press release”.  If this is what your idea of using “PR” for link building looks like, you’re doing it wrong:

 A poorly written press release trying to drive SEO value

While this is an SEO strategy that may have worked in the past, this press release offers absolutely no value to journalists (its theoretical audience).  Instead, it’s syndicated to news wires and sites.  Does this generate links?  Sure.  But do these links actually drive any SEO value?

Little value is driven from identical press releases

2) Instead, provide something of original and of value that your target audience (print journalist? Bloggers? Etc.) might actually be interested in.  Think of a headline that a news organization or blogger would use, and then provide original data that could fit into this story.

High value content could be original data you have access to from running your business, a consumer research study you commissioned, an original analysis of publicly available data, a human interest story, etc.  Offer something that can form the basis of an interesting news article (no one is going to republish your press release as-is).

Think Finance provide original (and controversial) survey results

Think Finance provide original (and controversial) survey results

Tom's Shoes generates positive PR through philanthropy

Tom's Shoes generates positive PR through philanthropy

3) Talk about something BESIDES your product that’s newsworthy.  Certainly there’s something interesting about your company that is unrelated to your core product or service – do your employees do volunteer work?  Does your company sponsor sports teams or scholarships?  Do you donate to charity, host knowledge exchanges or meet-ups, or speak at industry conferences or events?  Contests or giveaways?  These are all potential link building opportunities by themselves – extend their value further by pitching them as news stories to publications and bloggers.

Velocity Merchant Systems got CNN Money's Attention by Hosting a Job Fair

Velocity Merchant Systems got CNN Money's Attention by Hosting a Job Fair

4)  Hire a PR staffer or agency.  Even in the digital age, much of the PR world is relationship-based.  If you don’t have time to cultivate those relationships, your chances of getting plum placements in traditional press are significantly lower.  A PR agency can help ensure your story pitch gets into the hands of someone who actually wants to see it.

5)  Can’t afford to hire a dedicated PR staff member or agency?  Do it yourself.  Many in the media are on platforms like Twitter, Quora, Google+ and will source story ideas, data, and quotes through them.  Follow them on these platforms and watch for when they ask questions and provide relevant (not salesy) answers.

Crain's Chicago's Shia Kapos follows me on Twitter

HARO (Help a Reporter Out) is also an excellent source to match reporters and bloggers looking for sources with knowledgeable people ready to contribute.

Help a Reporter Out connects Journalists and Sources - For Free

Help a Reporter Out connects Journalists and Sources - For Free

6) Be controversial (or just ridiculous).  While not appropriate for every brand, being intentionally (or unintentionally) controversial can generate significant media coverage.  When Kenneth Cole’s twitter feed made light of the uprising in Egypt, he received a flood of media attention, articles, mentions and, yes, links.

Kenneth Cole Accidentally Started a Controversy, and Generated Press Coverage, with a Tweet

Kenneth Cole Accidentally Started a Controversy, and Generated Press Coverage, with a Tweet

BK's Bacon Sundae... controversial enough to generate tweets (and links)

7)  Complete the circle.  Leverage your promotions, partnerships, contests, and earned media coverage further, by involving your social media channels and site.  Followers are more apt to re-post impartial coverage from third parties vs. a brand’s own promotional content.

Converse leverage their promotion onto social media channels

While many of the examples used in this post showcase established brands, the tactics here can just as easily be applied to smaller or unknown brands -- they just may require additional footwork to get the traction they need to be effective.

Create content of value (original data, research, interviews), not mindless press releases, and get it in front of people who will find it interesting (reporters, trade groups, legislators, etc). If you can't afford a dedicated PR staff member or agency, make use of the many free tools and platforms available to get your message out.  The links will follow.

Filed under: Uncategorized 1 Comment
25Jan/114

Preparing for the Mobile Revolution? Not So Fast, Mr Schmidt


While soon-to-be-ex CEO Eric Schmidt’s announcement that he will be stepping down from his role as Chief Executive Officer at Google garnered the most attention, it was an offhand comment about smartphones in the same Mashable story that caught my attention. I traced the comment back to a short post in the Harvard Business Review by Schmidt, titled “Preparing for the Big Mobile Revolution.”

The entire piece is short – about 200 words – but the part I’d like to stop and think about is this:

Second, we must attend to the development of mobile money. Phones, as we know, are used as banks in many poorer parts of the world—and modern technology means that their use as financial tools can go much further than that.

Third, we want to increase the availability of inexpensive smartphones in the poorest parts of the world. We envision literally a billion people getting inexpensive, browser-based touchscreen phones over the next few years. Can you imagine how this will change their awareness of local and global information and their notion of education? And that will be just the start.

Schmidt's magical thinking
ignores the realities of development

Not to sound like a luddite, but this kind of thinking ignores the difficult realities of international development. Developing countries can benefit by being ‘late adopters’ of certain technologies – and cell phones DO provide a good example of this.

Erecting cell phone towers is cheaper than building out wired telephone networks, meaning that some developing countries bypassed broad adoption of wired telephone service in favor of cell phones, boosting the percent of population using cell phones.

'Dumb' phones do have widespread adoption in parts of the developing world

Wikipedia shows that Venezuela, with a GDP per capita of about $12,000 PPP (the U.S. has a GDP per capita of $47,000 PPP), has a 98% adoption rate of cell phones. Argentina, allegedly, has a 125% cell phone adoption rate – meaning more than one phone per person.

Cell phones obviously are being used fairly extensively in the developing world, but I had a hard time locating any reliable usage statistics on smartphone market penetration or use in the developing world. My firsthand experience is limited to a small number of countries, but the phone function I saw people use the most frequently, primarily as a cost-reduction strategy, was texting.

While smartphones provide much more functionality, they are functions that many users in the developing world can't afford to take advantage of. Consumers in developing countries tend to opt for less expensive handsets, pre-paid plans, and may face network coverage that is limited to heavily populated urban areas.

Phones as banks? Not yet.

I’m not sure exactly what Schmidt means by using phones as banks in many poorer parts of the world – in the poorer parts of the world that I’ve visited, most merchants didn’t accept credit or bank cards, let alone pay by cell phone. Most merchants and shop owners are small, local businesses that can't afford the fixed and marginal costs associated with payment processing.

I can’t imagine the local meat or produce marketing in rural China or India (and remember, despite the rapid industrialization and urbanization of these countries, most of the population still lives in rural farming areas) taking payment via Blackberry.

Seen this one before -
it was called One Laptop Per Child

Furthermore, the type of magical thinking Schmidt is engaging in when he talks about the benefits of touchscreen phones for education ignores realities like language and dialect barriers (mismatch between language of production and consumption), translation, and, above all else, literacy. How can people use Android-based phones to be aware of global information if they can’t read? The literacy rate in India is 66% and in some countries in Africa is below 50%.

Technology plays a role,
but don't ignore basic needs

The reality is that the needs of people in developing countries are pretty simple (food, education, health care) and do not include smartphones. ACHIEVING those needs, however, is not simple. Does technology and infrastructure play a role in expanding access and lowering costs to these basic necessities? Yes. But it’s a stretch to imply that smartphones and Google will, by themselves, substantially improve the lives of people living in poverty.

What do you think? Is Schmidt right - will smartphones revolutionize information and awareness in the developing world?

19Jan/1111

Scheduled #UsGuys Chats Survey Results

Many thanks to all that replied to my survey request - a total of 60 people filled out the survey!  In addition to the "24/7" format that currently is #UsGuys, scheduled chats on specific topics allow us to go beyond the water cooler and have in-depth discussions about distinct topics and, hopefully, attract knowledgeable guests.

With these chats, we can improve the utility of #UsGuys as a group and community while also attracting new members who are aligned with our vision.  With that, check out my awesome Excel 2003 charts.

The Results

Frequency

Frequency of #UsGuys Chats

46% of respondents expressed an interest in weekly chats, with about 1/3 wanting bi-weekly, and around a quarter wanting once a month chats.  Weekly chats could be feasible, if there is a strong enough interest, enough unique topics together, and a couple people interested in sharing hosting duties.

Day of Week

Preferred Day of Week

Preferences on what day of the week to host a scheduled #UsGuys chat were fairly evenly distributed, with the notable exception of Friday and Saturday.  Given the variety of chats that already exist, no matter what day/time #UsGuys scheduled chat occurs, it is bound to conflict with another chat.

Time of Day

Preferred Time of Day

For time preference, the 8-9p EST timeslot was by far the preference among respondents. There were also several write ins asking for times later than 9p for West Coasters.

Topic # Interested
Social media for B2B 32
Social media for B2C 32
Social media analytics 29
Search engine marketing 20
Integrating traditional & digital advertising 29
Measuring influence 23
Website analytics / biz intelligence 16
Website optimization 16
Blogging 33
Branding / brand management 35
Geo-location / LBS 19

The strongest interest among respondents was using social media for B2B and B2C marketing, branding and brand management,  blogging, social media analytics, and integrating traditional & digital marketing/advertising.

Write in suggestions included conversion optimization, enterprise social media, customer communities, importance of creative in business/marketing, ebook publishing, marketing beyond social media, specific social media platforms (FB pages, LinkedIn, etc.), and the technology behind social media.

What do you think?  Is it worth having a 'separate', scheduled #UsGuys chat on a specific topic?

Filed under: #UsGuys 11 Comments
4Jan/118

Goals and Resolutions for 2011

While I don’t think we need to wait until New Year’s to examine our lives or make resolutions, it is an auspicious time.  The beginning of a new year encourages us to look at the past and plan for the future.  With that, here are some of my thoughts / goals / resolutions for 2011.

Calvin and Hobbes Comic

Listen More than I Talk

I have been accused of being a “know it all” at times, but I’m quick to admit when I don’t know something.  If you think you’re an “expert” at something, what you’re really doing is closing yourself off to learning anything knew about it.  So on Twitter, Facebook, blogs, etc., I am going to try to LISTEN more than I TALK – I will learn more by recognizing the value in what others have to say.

Expand My Base

Tom’s post “Is Twitter Telling You Only What You Want to Hear?” (here) got me thinking about this.  While I have a wide variety of publications in my RSS reader, I typically always check the same ones.  And while I now follow over 850 people on Twitter, I rarely check my home feed, preferring to spend my limited time following the #UsGuys stream or even just following conversations I already have in progress.

So, I resolve in 2011 (tomorrow, hopefully!) to better organize the people I follow, including people with whom I frequently disagree.  Those are the viewpoints that are truly useful, as they force me to stop and re-examine my own views and thought processes.  Only by having my views challenged can I refine them.

Narrow My Focus

Reflecting back on 2010 and the variety of work I’ve done with and for clients, I realize that to get ahead, I need to narrow my focus.  In the closing months of 2010, there were a couple conversations where I was asked to describe what I do, and I realized I am a digital marketing generalist, when what I want and need to be is a digital marketer focused on a specific niche.

Whether that is a service/channel (Facebook, Twitter, whatever) or an industry/niche (digital marketing for non-profits, for small business, for restaurants) – by narrowing my focus, I can deepen my knowledge of that area.

Balance Work and Life

When I’m really excited about something, I tend to let it become all-consuming, and that is certainly true about the last several months of 2010.  I love the variety of tasks and challenges that comes with working with different clients.  I interact with people in different worlds and different capacities.  But I’m no good to anyone if I’m burnt out.

In 2011, I’m going to take the time to take care of myself – time to prepare good meals, exercise, take mental health/sanity breaks when need be.  The brain and body need downtime to process and re-charge.  You never know where you'll draw inspiration from - if you stay in 'work mode' 24/7, you may miss opportunities of which you're not even aware.

What are your goals & resolutions (work or personal) for 2011?

Filed under: personal 8 Comments
24Dec/1016

Using Social Media for Customer Service? Do it Right.

"Worst" BuyI met up with my friend, we’ll call her Kelsey, on December 22nd, a mere three days before Christmas.  While we were having dinner, an email she received on her iPhone alerted her that the item she had purchased online (not revealed here so as to not spoil any Christmas surprises) for in-store pickup at Best Buy was not available at the store she requested.  She was instructed to call an 800 number.

So after dinner, we sat in the car while she called and waited on hold, for approximately 10 minutes.  The agent, surprisingly helpful, found a store near where we were in the city that had the item in stock.  She assured Kelsey it was available for immediate pickup.

We raced over to Best Buy, arriving about 10 minutes later, and strode directly up to the customer service desk.  No line!  Kelsey explained the situation to the representative and handed over her credit card and ID.

The rep looked at the computer and said, “Well, it’s in process.  We have three of that item in stock.  This means the warehouse is looking for it.  It could take about an hour.”

Kelsey: “If it’s stock, you can’t just get it?”

Representative: “You can wait 10 minutes and see if the status on the computer has changed.”

Me: “Uh, you can’t just like, call back there, and tell them to expedite it, since we are already physically at the store?”

Representative: “You can go and find one on the shelf yourself, buy it, and then cancel this order.”

Kelsey: “We’ll check back in a bit to see if it’s ready.”

An offhand tweet turns a
customer experience from bad to worse

We relocated to a friend’s bar nearby to visit and kill time, waiting for Best Buy to locate her present.  While at the bar, I tweeted on Kelsey’s behalf, saying “Terrible customer service at @BestBuy, per usual”.

My tweet immediately elicited several retweets and responses from my followers and, about 35 minutes later, a response from Best Buy’s “twelpforce” agent3012, suggesting that I email them at twelpforce@bestbuy.com.

Wanting to see how deep this rabbit hole went, I wrote out a (rather lengthy!) email, describing what had happened up to this point, and including Kelsey’s information and order number.  Immediately, I received a canned auto-reply stating they would reply to my email in 1-3 business days.

"If you’re going to offer the promise of customer service via social media, you have to deliver"

Now, what is the point of utilizing social media as a customer service channel, if you’re going to redirect people to email, and then wait 72 hours to respond?  Twitter is, for better or worse, about immediate gratification.  If you’re going to offer the promise of customer service via social media, you have to deliver.

Finding their auto email ridiculous, I immediately tweeted, “Wow, you reply to emails in 1-3 days. Really useful, Best Buy”, which was subsequently retweeted by several of my followers, and spawned a brief discussion about employees being empowered to deliver resolutions for complaints originating from social media.

At some point during this tweetstorm, Kelsey received an automated email informing us her item was ready.  Remember, at this point, I’ve heard nothing from Best Buy’s “twelpforce” since the original tweet asking me to email them.  We went and picked up the item without incident, and then, it being past 10p, I went home.

At 11:15 @bernierjohn, of Best Buy’s Twitter team, sent me “you are catching us at our absolute peak of volume, sorry, we’re trying. It’s never taken 3 days, for it’s worth.”  The conversation continued for a bit but, ultimately, was moot at this point – we already had the item.

What Can Best Buy
(or any company) Learn from This?

If their front line personnel had provided better customer service, I never would have taken to the Twittersphere.  I don’t know how their inventory management system works, but it seems like it should be possible to expedite an item for someone who is in the store to pick it up.  If not, their phone agent (doubtlessly outsourced), shouldn’t have told us it would’ve been immediately available – in that case, we never would have gone directly there.

"In this age of social media,
everyone has a megaphone"

The next lesson is that in this age of social media, everyone has a megaphone.  Instead of immediately addressing my issue, the first contact with Best Buy on Twitter pushed me to a different channel.  Through my original tweet, the retweets of it & conversations around it, how many people do you think witnessed some part of this interchange?  How damaging is it to Best Buy’s brand?

It’s certainly not going to bankrupt them, but, in an age where consumers are walking into electronics stores armed with smartphones, ready to compare and find the lowest possible price, you’d think Best Buy would work harder to differentiate itself through excellent customer service.

Update 1/2/2010

Two days after my initial contact with Best Buy's "twelpforce" (Twitter-based customer service), I received an email from Elizabeth, a community supervisor for Best Buy corporate.  Overall, I'm sympathetic and understanding of Best Buy's position, but this wasn't a single failure or mistakes -- there were multiple errors that compounded to cause a negative customer service experience.  The item wasn't available at the first store (when the site said it was), the agent misinformed us that the item would be available immediately at the second store (it wasn't), the staff at the second store were completely unhelpful, AND Best Buy's "twelpforce" failed to understand our issue and instead pushed us to email.

As Jeremy said in the comments below, no amount of social media can change a company with bad customer service.

Full text of Best Buy's email:

First, please accept my apology for the delayed response to your email.
I know that 1-3 business days isn't an ideal response time, but I feel
it's very important to set appropriate expectations.  While Twelpforce
is made up of nearly 3,000 BlueShirts, Geek Squad Agents, and corporate
employees throughout our company, more detailed emails requiring
additional research are assigned to my dedicated social media team,
consisting of 14 Community Connectors.  Unfortunately, with holiday
volume, we are not able to respond as quickly as we would like to, but
we do take the time to respond to every customer who contacts us,
assigning in the order received.

Second, I see a number of failures that contributed to your poor
experience.  When our BestBuy.com changed your pickup to the Elston
store, they should not have said it would be available immediately; two
confirmation emails are required before the item is available.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Help-Topics/Store-Pickup/pcmcat204400050014.
c?id=pcmcat204400050014
So this misinformation guaranteed
disappointment.  The store associate's response only added to this -
surely, as you said, more could have been done to see if the process
could be sped up to save you the hassle of waiting even longer.  I have
forwarded details of your experience to the store management so they can
address this service level with their staff.

After all this, I'm glad to see you were able to pick up your order.
While I know I can't erase the frustration or compensate you for your
time, I have credited your order $25 as a gesture.  This should appear
in your account within 48-72 hours.

Thank you very much for sharing your experience - we need customers like
you to keep improving, especially with our store pickup process, which
we know can be a great service if done right.  Best wishes to you and
your family this holiday!

Regards,

~Elizabeth
Community Supervisor
Best Buy Corporate

Have you used Twitter to voice a customer complaint? Was your situation resolved satisfactorily?

10Dec/101

UsGuys Chat #2: Social Media for Social Good

First, let me extend my gratitude and thanks to everyone who made our second #UsGuys chat a success – our guests, Paula Goldman (@pdgoldman) of Huffington post and Andy Smith (@kabbenbock), co-author of The Dragonfly Effect, and @pineappleskip.

Also, my thanks to all the attendees - #UsGuys has grown to be a large and diverse tribe – including geographically diverse, and I know that 7-8p EST isn’t the best time for everyone.  What make #UsGuys so valuable is that, combined, our expertise and insight cut across many different disciplines (and time zones).

Examples of Social Media
for Social Good

To get started, I asked our guests and chatters to throw out examples of social media used for social good – not restricted to non-profits, but including advocacy, political, and socially-minded businesses as well.

The first thing that came to mind was non-profits and fundraising.  @cbanksindy noted that #4SqChat signed a sponsorship deal to raise money for Stand Up to Cancer.  @solete noted breast cancer awareness campaigns that leveraged Facebook.  @Kabbenbock shared his favorite example, @charitywater, which he profiles in his book as crossing different kinds of media to get their message out.

We also discussed corporate-backed philanthropy in the form of Pepsi (too bad @Tommoradpour wasn’t with us until later!).  The Pepsi Refresh project has brought awareness and funds to a number of causes around the U.S. and the globe.

@MargieClayman had a relatively unconventional suggestion with the fake BP Twitter account used to satirize the company during the oil spill.

Is "Building Awareness" Enough?

I asked the question what people thing about campaigns that seek to “build awareness” by having users change their profile picture or avatar (ie, cartoon photo to raise awareness of child abuse).  Several users commented that they have participated in such campaigns by changing pictures or avatars.

@MargieClayman  argued that this type of campaign CAN be effective if paired with a call to action.  @pdgoldman argued that awareness = impressions, impact = sales.  @cbanksindy emphasized the call to action component of turning awareness into action and donations.

We also discussed whether “click to donate” campaigns work, with the general consensus and experience of the group suggesting that they do.  Examples included Children International, Red Cross, No Kid Hungry, etc.

What About Politics?

This is probably the public policy junky in me, but something that wasn’t discussed thoroughly that I remain interested in is how social media is used for activism and organizing.  Social media has become a huge part of the political establishment – we need look no further than the precedent set by Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign.

While there have been extensive discussion of Malcom Gladwell’s piece on the #UsGuys stream in the past, I’d hoped to discuss it during this chat in more detail.

Is Using Social Media for
Social Good Different?

Many participants in the chat argued that the same basic principles apply when using social media channels, whether it be for social good or for business.  @kabbenbock put forth that social media for any purpose relies on emotion and people’s networks to spread and multiply.  @ken_rosen pointed out that non-profits can use social media to allow the story to take center stage and ease the path to a donation request.

I would argue there are some differences between charity causes and business.  I agree with @pdgoldman’s statement that people tend to be more receptive to charity / non-profit “advertising” than purely commercial advertising.

I also argued that non-profits need to incorporating transparency even more strongly than business – if I’m donating my money to a cause, I want to make sure that’s what it’s actually being used for.  I also argued that, in some cases, non-profits may be able to leverage an emotional response more than traditional business, ie. “Save the Children” commercials that show starving children.

Is Social Media Changing
the Donation Model?

We also discussed how social media may be changing the donation model.  The cases of Red Cross post-Haiti and NPR were discussed.  Both are organizations that have, historically, relied primarily on a small number of large donations from corporate partners and foundations.  In the wake of the Haitian earthquake, the Red Cross was able to raise a large amount of money through small ($10) donations using its SMS text-to-donate campaign.

@Karen5Lund made the point that social media may allow funds to be raised more quickly, and @pdgoldman suggested that may be especially true after emergencies / in urgent situations.  @solete argued that these types of social media campaigns work because they already have established trust, a shared mission, and a huge reach.

@terez07 brought up the example of Kiva, a microlending service which pairs donors with those in need via the web.  Kiva lets potential donors see those seeking funds, read their story, and understand what kind of difference their funding could make.

#UsGuys also debated donating money versus donating time.  There are many factors which impact people’s ability to donate time or money – and, depending on the cause, one may be more feasible than the other.  @DebbieLB noted that it is easier for some to give money than time, as time is our scarcest resource.

How do you measure success when
using social media for social good?

@onejillian pointed out that when goals are different, measurements need to be different.  I’d be inclined to agree.  @kabbenbock also emphasized that before assigning metrics, you have to be crystal clear on what your goal is (which so many fail to do!).

While @danperezfilms argued that it’s about the money, we have to remember that non-profits are, well, non-profits – the money is an END to a different cause.  Donations could be money, or they could be time, food, clothing, toiletries, etc.  Additionally, not all metrics are things that are easy to measure – goodwill and awareness for example.

That said, applying business philosophies to the non-profit world can help improve outcomes.  @REALChaseAdams said the purpose of a non-profit is to resolve a problem, so that measurement is progress toward that resolution, not money raised.

By tracking people’s first contact with a non-profit (Facebook? Twitter?  Website?  Other channel?) and monitoring their involvement (dollars/materials/time donated), non-profits can begin to analyze what channels are the most effective.  @DebbieLB wrote that she values connections much more than metrics, which is a sentiment with which I strongly agree.

The last question, which we didn't really get to, was about people’s predictions for how social media will be used as a tool for social good in 2011.  Please feel free to leave your predictions in the comments section.

I wrote up this summary pretty quickly, so please feel free to point out any errors or omissions (and spelling mistakes) in the comments.

7Dec/102

#UsGuys 2nd Chat: Social Media for Social Good

The second #UsGuys chat will take place this Thursday, December 9th, at 7-8p EST.  The topic is “Social Media for Social Good.”  If you're not familiar with Twitter chats, read my post about them.

I am pleased to announce our excellent guests for Thursday’s chat:

Andy Smith, co-author of “The Dragonfly Effect”.  According to the book’s website:

The Dragonfly Effect is a guide for how individuals, organizations, and companies can use social media to propel social change.

There’s a great interview with Andy and his co-author, Jennifer Aaker, on the book’s Amazon page.

Paula Goldman, a social entrepreneur and anthropologist, who is also a writer for the Huffington Post.  Paula recently wrote a reaction to Malcom Gladwell’s controversy-causing piece, “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted”. Paula's piece addresses the Tea Party phenomenon and looks at some common claims about social media.

@Pineappleskip, located in Papua New Guinea, focuses on social marketing, community engagement, and capacity development, and will also be joining #UsGuys chat on Thursday.

Provisional Questions for #UsGuys Chat

To help you get a jump start on the discussion, I’ve included my (provisional) questions.

Question 1: What are some examples of “social media for social good”?  This doesn’t have to be restricted to the non-profit world.  What unconventional or novel examples of using social media to achieve social good do you have?

Question 2: Is using social media for social good somehow qualitatively different than using it for other things (business or personal)?  Is “PR” or “marketing” for social good different?

Question 3: How to you measure success when using social media for social good?  Are the metrics or processes different for social good vs. more traditional business goals?

Question 4: What are your predictions for how social media will be used for social good in 2011?

Can't make the chat?  Don't worry, I'll write up a summary and post it on this site the next day.

What questions would you like to see asked in Thursday’s chat?  Feel free to suggest questions for our guests and the chat in the comments section.